One Year In, Austin's Revenue-Positive Bus Network Redesign Is Gaining Riders - TransitCenter
Operations Policy
August 8, 2019
One Year In, Austin’s Revenue-Positive Bus Network Redesign Is Gaining Riders

In June of 2018, Austin launched a redesign of its bus network. Since then, ridership has increased 4.5%, making Capital Metro one of the few transit systems in the U.S. where ridership is on the rise.

The success of the network redesign, known as Cap Remap, was the result of careful planning and preparation. Capital Metro was meticulous in the run-up to launch, conducting extensive outreach to convey the changes to bus riders, and helping bus operators in their role as frontline messengers for the redesign.

Another key to success: Cap Remap added service — it was not a revenue-neutral network redesign.

Dottie Watkins, Vice President of Bus Operations at Capital Metro, describes the core concept of Cap Remap as “meeting the community where the transit demand is.” Access to frequent transit — the number one priority for Austin transit riders surveyed before the redesign — is now much more widespread.

Capital Metro also dramatically improved bus service on weekends. Historically, says Watkins, it’s “been hard for Austin households who work Saturdays and Sundays to give up a second car if transit only works for you on some [days of the week].”

Cap Remap reallocated service so more routes run at least every 15 minutes from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m., seven days a week. The number of these high-frequency, all day, every day routes increased from 6 to 14.

When Capital Metro embarked on a bus network redesign, the plan was to stay budget neutral. However, without an increase in service, the options were either an expanded network of high-frequency routes that significantly sacrificed service in lower-ridership areas, or a scaled-back frequent network that preserved existing coverage.

Neither option was acceptable. Capital Metro and its board didn’t want to give up on the high-ridership, frequent network model. At the same time, they wanted over 98% of current transit riders to remain within a quarter-mile of service.

The solution, made possible by growing sales tax revenue, was to add resources for operations. Capital Metro increased service by 9% as part of the redesign. With this net addition of service, cutting some low-ridership routes became more politically feasible. The agency also had greater leeway to proceed with other changes, like consolidating bus stops.

Changing the network so dramatically meant that a majority of Austin bus riders experienced some sort of change in their travel pattern – anything from a bus stop that was moved to a trip that now requires a transfer to reach one’s destination. This required a lot of communication with riders to reassure them that their total travel time would be reduced even if their trip involved an additional transfer.

A year into the new network, the effort is paying off. Capital Metro passenger feedback about the redesign has primarily been positive, and Watkins sees the ridership increases as a vote of confidence.

Capital Metro promises riders that these frequent routes will adhere to 15-minute headways, de-emphasizing clock-based schedules. “What customers want is not to have to plan their life around some obscure bus schedule,” said Watkins.

What customers want is not to have to plan their life around some obscure bus schedule

Capital Metro is still refining its service management plan to minimize bus bunching and gapping as they occur in real time. “As an industry we’re talking about increasing our frequent services,” said Watkins, “but the way operationally you handle a service that’s primarily being promoted based on its headway as opposed to its schedule is different.”

The bus network redesign also involved coordination with the city of Austin. Cap Remap called for street changes to prioritize transit and walking, including pedestrian improvements at key transfer points in the new network. Capital Metro had been requesting some of these changes for years — the large scope of the redesign prompted action.

Crucially, the coordination is continuing. Capital Metro and the city of Austin convene a working group on a regular basis to discuss opportunities for on-street transit priority. Those are the types of changes Austin needs to keep improving service and growing ridership.

More Like This Post:

November 24, 2020
Image for: Good Transit Policy Was Good Politics This Election Day Good Transit Policy Was Good Politics This Election Day

Even during a pandemic that has severely reduced transit ridership and created uncertainty about household budgets, voters on November 3 recognized the value of transit and decided to ramp up public investment in their local systems.

Read More
October 26, 2020
Image for: Los Angeles Bus Riders Speak Out Against Metro’s Bus Service Cuts Los Angeles Bus Riders Speak Out Against Metro’s Bus Service Cuts

Before COVID-19 struck, LA Metro seemed to be turning a corner on bus service with the ambitious network redesign known as NextGen. But the new budget plan signals a return to the days when Metro regularly overlooked the bus riders who make the vast majority of trips on its services.

Read More